Poll for new features ?!!

[Frazer]

I voted B, for the simple reason that players will stop using virtual gangs so much and hopefully try to form friendships with other players. I also like the idea that money wont be the single thing that rules the game.

I do however like the sabotage idea and feel that should certainly be implemented at a later date.

[Peppe69]

I voted B, for the simple reason that players will stop using virtual gangs so much and hopefully try to form friendships with other players. I also like the idea that money wont be the single thing that rules the game.

I do however like the sabotage idea and feel that should certainly be implemented at a later date.

Good point dude!

Best regards,

[BETTMAN]

I do not vote because you so much benefit some and do silly others. That's why I do not vote.

[SilentAssassin]

I will go for the sabotage, rather than for the gang option. Why ? Because more players will have the chance to win the top. Like always, there is some guy that is top stats for example, and he can solo smack any gang. Voting for more gangs, and more people in gangs, means that guys with many rabbits and camels playing for him to have the chance to win even easier. By sabotage, you can stop these kind of people. Just imagine, sabotaging a player with full stats, making him lose 6% of his stats. If 10 players do it and only 5 succeed for instance, that means 30% loss of stats. On the other hand, you can easily stop players from robbing on important events by making them lose their tickets, giving you, again, another shot to play and there are many many reasons for which i voted Sabotage.

[5TORM]

Votei A. Cara, joguei sempre na esportiva desde a rodada 30 e poucos, há alguns anos atrás, e esse ano lembrei do jogo e retornei. Sei lá, mas na minha opinião tá cada vez mais difícil formar amigos no jogo pra jogar, etc

Então acho que sozinho é a melhor forma, BR passa a perna em BR ... hahahaha

[ALEX]

Voted A. B means more camels and more "donations" for big names.

[Bebynho20]

Voted A. B means more camels and more "donations" for big names.

What ? How you figure that out ?!

[Addiction]

I will go for the sabotage, rather than for the gang option. Why ? Because more players will have the chance to win the top. Like always, there is some guy that is top stats for example, and he can solo smack any gang. Voting for more gangs, and more people in gangs, means that guys with many rabbits and camels playing for him to have the chance to win even easier. By sabotage, you can stop these kind of people. Just imagine, sabotaging a player with full stats, making him lose 6% of his stats. If 10 players do it and only 5 succeed for instance, that means 30% loss of stats. On the other hand, you can easily stop players from robbing on important events by making them lose their tickets, giving you, again, another shot to play and there are many many reasons for which i voted Sabotage.

Even though what you're saying makes sense, by this logic top teams will abuse sabotage as well, undermining even more their (few) competitors. But I like the sabotage idea as well, I just think that we need more gangs and players able to fight for top before we put sabotage at the game.

[Bebynho20]

Even though what you're saying makes sense, by this logic top teams will abuse sabotage as well, undermining even more their (few) competitors. But I like the sabotage idea as well, I just think that we need more gangs and players able to fight for top before we put sabotage at the game.

Actually we will make it that this can't be abused by teams... If we continue to have this mentality of " let's not add that to the game because people will abuse it " we will never have new things !!! Features , characters or professions get abused in games all the time but people adapt.

Sabotage is COMING and we will make it so people can't abuse it. I do not want to see a lvl 3 guy being able to sabotage a lvl 13 but I would like to see more diversity in top and a different game play that what we have now. I do agree that we need better gangs and we need people to create new gangs that can fight for top . Maybe anonymous raves will help since that will stop donations and teams becoming so powerful so fast which was always a big issue here.

[Addiction]

Actually we will make it that this can't be abused by teams... If we continue to have this mentality of " let's not add that to the game because people will abuse it " we will never have new things !!! Features , characters or professions get abused in games all the time but people adapt.

Sabotage is COMING and we will make it so people can't abuse it. I do not want to see a lvl 3 guy being able to sabotage a lvl 13 but I would like to see more diversity in top and a different game play that what we have now. I do agree that we need better gangs and we need people to create new gangs that can fight for top . Maybe anonymous raves will help since that will stop donations and teams becoming so powerful so fast which was always a big issue here.

Sure, I agree with with you that changes are always needed and we cannot push ourselves not doing new things because "people will abuse", yeah, ofc we need to addapt. Just saying that imo we need more good teams before sabotage comes, and the game is clearly going on the direction of having more good gangs, which is very good. If you say that sabotage will be balanced, I trust you and hope you do a good work. Like I said, I like the idea and I think it'll be very interesting for the game overall.